Therefore my current idea of a setup would be: -35mm f1.4 for portrait and low light street photography. -18-55 as an all-rounder (landscape, street,travel) -50-230 for landscape and sports/wildlife (I very rarely shoot these so the XC works fine for me) -Maybe getting the Fujinon 10-24mm in the future to get those extra mm in landscape shooting.
16mm f2.8 review by lenstip! Jul 23, 2019. Lenstip finally released the review of the xf 16mm f2.8. From their charts this lens is marvelous in the center even at f2.8 but the borders are soft. CA is not as bad as some people claimed. Distortion is bad, it could explain the softness of the borders. -- hide signature --.
Home ā†’ Reviews ā†’ Cameras and Lenses ā†’ Fuji XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Review. Fuji XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR Review. By Nasim Mansurov 56 Comments
\n\nfuji 16 55 f2 8 review

With a full frame equivalent 24mm focal length, the XF 16mm f/2.8 is perfect for shooting travel and landscape photos while on the go. This lens also fills in nicely for candid people photos and a little street photography. The XF 16mm f/2.8 isnā€™t as fast as Fujiā€™s 16mm f/1.4, but it is nearly 8oz lighter, $600 cheaper, and is an overall

Weather sealed and f2.8.. Equivalent to 24-78mm on full frame so covers 24, 28, 35, 50 & 78mm and all focal lengths in between. Lots of glass so fairly heavy, but worth carrying the weight because the sharpness is absolutely superb. Can check the MTF charts for this lens on the Fuji website. The 16-55 at 16mm and F2.8 is fine for nightscapes. I have used it for that and it works well. Very nice. So does the 18-55 at 18mm F2.8. Both work well. I have the Samyang 12mm F2 its also good, some chromatic aberration wide open but correctable. 16 1.4 on paper sounds good but posted examples show a fair amount of coma in the outer corners.

MTF (resolution) The Fujinon XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR produced decent results in the MTF lab although it stayed short of the high expectations. The sweet spot is the 16mm setting with an outstanding center quality and a very good outer image region at mainstream aperture settings. From here on the quality drops gradually towards the tele end.

Fujifilmā€™s XF 18-55mm f2.8-4 is a general-purpose zoom for its X-mount mirrorless cameras, and often bundled with bodies as a kit lens. Launched in September 2012, it delivers a flexible 27-84mm equivalent range taking you from wide-angle to mild telephoto, making it an ideal walk-around lens. The 18-55mm focal length on cropped-frame / APSC
I have both the EOS R + RF 24-105 and the X-H1 + 16-55 mm f2.8. Overall the R with RF 24-105 is sharper from edge to edge throughout the zoom range and has more micro contrast then XF 16-55 red badge. p.1 #3 Ā· p.1 #3 Ā· Canon EOS R + RF 24-105 vs Fujifilm X-T2 + 16-55mm. Do you feel like the Canon EOS R kit is a significant upgrade to the Fuji
Fujifilmā€™s XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR is one of Fujifilmā€™s attempts to pull working professionals over to the system with high-quality versatile lens offerings. Not everyone shoots with small fast prime lenses, and many working professionals rely day-in-day-out on their standard and telephoto zoom lenses to get the job done. The 16-55mmF2.8 is just that - a standard zoom that gets the job done
Whilst discussing the lens he saw fit to pit it not against the XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4, but his own XF 16-55 f/2.8. The review is very interesting and I recommend it to anyone interested in either one of those lenses.
.
  • qshsv011v5.pages.dev/49
  • qshsv011v5.pages.dev/130
  • qshsv011v5.pages.dev/449
  • qshsv011v5.pages.dev/273
  • qshsv011v5.pages.dev/456
  • qshsv011v5.pages.dev/411
  • qshsv011v5.pages.dev/358
  • qshsv011v5.pages.dev/381

    • fuji 16 55 f2 8 review